News & Insightse

A New York judge halted a hearing after learning a litigant used an undisclosed AI-generated avatar to argue his case.

The U.S. Copyright Office published a groundbreaking, non-binding, pre-publication report examining whether using copyrighted works to train generative AI models falls within “fair use.

In recent years, the financial industry has undergone a significant revolution with the widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools.

Thaler v. Perlmutter: The court affirmed that under the Copyright Act, only a human can be recognized as the “author” of a work

As the landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) rapidly evolves, it raises essential legal questions.

Artificial intelligence, which entered our lives by storm in the last year, is of far-reaching importance for the future of humanity, and has been described as the “fourth industrial revolution”.

The Israeli Commissioner of Patents (“the Commissioner”): Artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be considered an “inventor” within the meaning of such term in the Israeli Patents Law, 1967 (“the Patents Law”); therefore, AI cannot own or transfer an invention.