News & Insightse

Adv. Ran Vogel reviews Japan’s IP Strategic Program 2026 and its implications for AI companies and rights holders.

When generative AI writes, paints, and composes – who is the author? Dr. Eyal Brook examines the copyright subject.

AI coding tools are bringing speed and efficiency, but also urgent questions about copyright, ownership and licensing.

Anthropic’s CEO outlines AI’s transformative potential and its gravest dangers. A must-read for legal and regulatory professionals.

As courts and creators grapple with defining human vs. AI authorship, AIPPI’s 2025 Resolution offers a clear framework on AI & Copyright—addressing data use, liability, transparency, and AI-generated works to guide the next era of copyright law.

On 10 July 2025, the European Commission received the final version of the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI Models (GPAI).

The U.S. Copyright Office published a groundbreaking, non-binding, pre-publication report examining whether using copyrighted works to train generative AI models falls within “fair use.

In recent years, the financial industry has undergone a significant revolution with the widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools.

Thaler v. Perlmutter: The court affirmed that under the Copyright Act, only a human can be recognized as the “author” of a work

As the landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) rapidly evolves, it raises essential legal questions.