News & Insightse

AI coding tools are bringing speed and efficiency, but also urgent questions about copyright, ownership and licensing.

Anthropic’s CEO outlines AI’s transformative potential and its gravest dangers. A must-read for legal and regulatory professionals.

As courts and creators grapple with defining human vs. AI authorship, AIPPI’s 2025 Resolution offers a clear framework on AI & Copyright—addressing data use, liability, transparency, and AI-generated works to guide the next era of copyright law.

On 10 July 2025, the European Commission received the final version of the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI Models (GPAI).

The U.S. Copyright Office published a groundbreaking, non-binding, pre-publication report examining whether using copyrighted works to train generative AI models falls within “fair use.

In recent years, the financial industry has undergone a significant revolution with the widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools.

Thaler v. Perlmutter: The court affirmed that under the Copyright Act, only a human can be recognized as the “author” of a work

As the landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) rapidly evolves, it raises essential legal questions.

Artificial intelligence, which entered our lives by storm in the last year, is of far-reaching importance for the future of humanity, and has been described as the “fourth industrial revolution”.

The Israeli Commissioner of Patents (“the Commissioner”): Artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be considered an “inventor” within the meaning of such term in the Israeli Patents Law, 1967 (“the Patents Law”); therefore, AI cannot own or transfer an invention.