When a Cancellation Notice Is Not Enough: Israeli Court Sharpens Airlines’ Passenger-Choice Duties

1 min. read

In Gabso et al. v. Israir Aviation and Tourism Ltd., the Israeli District Court held that a generic cancellation email was insufficient where the airline failed to offer passengers a real choice between refund and rebooking. The Court also rejected reliance on a mere hyperlink to the Aviation Services Law as a substitute for clear, accessible rights information.

The ruling is a timely reminder for airlines operating in or into Israel: cancellation notices must be proactive, practical, and passenger-facing. Where an airline fails to present the statutory choice, ignores passenger inquiries, or breaches related duties, exemplary damages may follow.

you might be interested in

News

Israir has been offered the opportunity to acquire Arkia. Adv. Hagai Doron explains to Globes why the proposed deal is likely to face close scrutiny from the Israel Competition Authority.

News

The Tel Aviv District Court approved a debt arrangement for autotech company REE, which owes NIS 51 million, averting liquidation

Articles

From Ben Gurion’s post-war rebound to a landmark Supreme Court ruling on cancelled flights – what’s new in Israel aviation law.

Subscribe

Get the latest updates straight to your inbox

SHARE

Facebook
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email
Print