When a Cancellation Notice Is Not Enough: Israeli Court Sharpens Airlines’ Passenger-Choice Duties

1 min. read

In Gabso et al. v. Israir Aviation and Tourism Ltd., the Israeli District Court held that a generic cancellation email was insufficient where the airline failed to offer passengers a real choice between refund and rebooking. The Court also rejected reliance on a mere hyperlink to the Aviation Services Law as a substitute for clear, accessible rights information.

The ruling is a timely reminder for airlines operating in or into Israel: cancellation notices must be proactive, practical, and passenger-facing. Where an airline fails to present the statutory choice, ignores passenger inquiries, or breaches related duties, exemplary damages may follow.

you might be interested in

News

Complex merger reviews at Israel’s Competition Authority can take up to a year – and t.

Updates

S. Horowitz’s tax update covers four key developments: spreading of income from capital compensation, a landmark ruling in the NSO acquisition case on artificial transactions and penalty limits, real-time tax relief for new immigrants and returning residents, and clarification on the timing of “sale” in net real estate transactions.

Updates

Delaware court rejects Vertex’s formulation patent claim against Lupin: an exact number couldn’t be stretched after the fact.

Subscribe

Get the latest updates straight to your inbox

SHARE

Facebook
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email
Print