The Home Court Advantage

1 min. read

The Israeli Patent Commissioner has ruled that AI cannot be considered an “inventor” under Israeli patent law, rejecting Dr. Stephen Thaler’s DABUS applications. This decision aligns with rulings worldwide, but leaves open crucial questions about required human involvement in AI-assisted inventions.

Read our comprehensive analysis on Lexology.

Published in

you might be interested in

Updates

The Third Circuit rejects fair use in Thomson Reuters v. Ross: a key ruling on AI training, but not a universal rule.

Updates

Israeli court rules there is no cap on flight-cancellation accommodation costs unless the Minister acts under Section 9A.

Updates

Ben Gurion’s August 20 shutdown left airlines facing liability questions – and possible paths to recovery.

Subscribe

Get the latest updates straight to your inbox

SHARE

Facebook
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email
Print